Discoveries for brass players, once a month. Join our free newsletter →

4 min. read

This article is free.

Editorial

Editorial

Health, hope, every enthusiasm for your work, a just reward for your efforts in the form of private satisfaction and professional success — these are my wishes for you all in 1987. Let us all contribute, however little, to promoting peace in the world by working hard to develop the privileged field of our musical and instrumental art.

Every nation’s treasure

Every country has its own history, great musicians, exceptional virtuosos and special institutions. BRASS BULLETIN has set itself the task of presenting these to you in the years ahead. After Hungary (BB 48) and Finland (BB 53) we are working on special issues devoted to East Germany, Belgium, Austria and Spain, passing by way of the Netherlands, Sweden, West Germany, the United States, Japan, France etc., helped and guided in this exhilarating work by all the musicians of goodwill we meet.

Of course these special country presentations will be in addition to our normal international programme. Don’t hesitate to contact us if you have ideas. A file on each country is being opened and prepared in advance.

Competitions

You will be interested in Edward H. Tarr’s review of the recent Munich trumpet competition (p. 7). Still, although the figures are very interesting, it is difficult to agree with the conclusion, in which Edward Tarr repeats what juries have been saying for years after giving their verdicts: “less technique, more musicality”.

Let’s take this Munich competition. As with almost all the others, this was a diabolical musical marathon where the mental pressures and physical demands were increased to a level which no international virtuoso soloist will ever have to face in his artistic life.

Those responsible for the programme are responsible for the problem of musicality.

So the candidates are accused of not taking enough risks, of not offering a refined enough interpretation?

Well, what were the set works? How fast did the competition proceed?

The marathon/obstacle course alternated tests of advanced technique and endurance with (classical) musical works. Once the players’ lips were swollen and numbed with fatigue and they themselves were quite exhausted, they were presented with a delicate, well known concerto such as the Haydn, the Hummel, the Mozart or the Albrechtsberger — as if to say, “Now let’s see how these young folk are for musicality.”

This is indefensible. Moreover it is absurd. If we really want to find virtuoso brass players who are first and foremost musicians, we must give them a platform with no traps, one like those they will find in the concert hall.

Indeed these considerations have already made some organisers rethink the problem. Thus there is a new tendency, originated by more realistic people such as Roger Delmotte with his Toulon trumpet competition. There the programmes are designed to show up exceptional artists. You will remember that in 1981 Hakan Hardenberger could not cope with the mind-bending obstructions at the Geneva competition (he got a 2nd prize). Six months later he won 1st prize at the Toulon competition. Today he is pursuing a brilliant career which vindicates the Delmotte option.

Talent is really revealed better and more fairly when the competitors’ normal potential is respected. The differences between them are then on a refined musical basis — which of course does not exclude technical prowess.

Conclusion

[letter from Thomas Stevens]

Your remarks concerning the fact that everyone talks about musicality but ultimately ends up counting missed notes struck a sympathetic chord with me. I searched and found a cassette of an interview I did for National Public Radio a few years ago — I’ll quote verbatim:

Interviewer: Ernest Fleischmann (LAPO General Director) has stated that he likes to see musicians take chances for the sake of the musical effect even if they miss notes in the process.

Stevens:

Yes, this is true and many orchestra conductors quite often say the same thing. But, if you take those chances and miss notes, they call you into the office and ask why you missed them. And... if you miss too many notes too many times, they fire you!

Interviewer: So what you’re saying is, they don’t really mean it?

Stevens:

I don’t know if this is always the case, but there’s an old dictum which goes: “Musicality is subjective; missed notes are objective.” One is a value judgement, the other is a technical fact — and facts are easier to deal with.

International music competition in Munich

YearInstrumentLaureate (Country)Prize
1956HornGerd Seifert (R.F.A.)1st Prize
1958TrumpetWerner Roelstraete (Belgique)2nd Prize
1960HornJosef Brazda (Tchécoslovaquie)2nd Prize
1960HornPeter Damm (R.D.A.)2nd Prize
1960HornJaroslav Kofulan (Tchécoslovaquie)3rd Prize
1960HornHans-Helfried Richter (R.F.A.)3rd Prize
1963TrumpetMaurice André (France)1st Prize
1963TrumpetFrancis Marcel Hardy (France)3rd Prize
1964HornHermann Baumann (R.F.A.)1st Prize
1964HornFerenc Tarjáni (Hongrie)2nd Prize
1964HornJaroslav Kotulan (Tchécoslovaquie)3rd Prize
1965TromboneJean-Pierre Mathieu (France)2nd Prize
1965TromboneZdenek Pulec (Tchécoslovaquie)2nd Prize
1966Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent du Théâtre Kirov de Leningrad (USSR)1st Prize
1966Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent Académique de Prague (Tchécoslovaquie)2nd Prize
1966Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent de la Deutsche Oper Berlin (R.F.A.)3rd Prize
1969HornNorbert Hauptmann (R.F.A.)1st Prize
1969HornZdenek Tylsar (Tchécoslovaquie)2nd Prize
1969HornPavel Jevstignejev (U.R.S.S.)3rd Prize
1971TrumpetJanis Marshelle Coffman (USA)2nd Prize
1971TrumpetGuy Touvron (France)2nd Prize
1973HornJohannes Ritzkowsky (R.F.A.)2nd Prize
1973HornVladimira Bouchalová (Tchécoslovaquie)3rd Prize
1973HornVladislav Grigorov (Bulgarie)3rd Prize
1974TromboneRonald Barron (USA)2nd Prize
1974TromboneBranimir Slokar (Yougoslavie)2nd Prize
1974TromboneMichel Becquet (France)3rd Prize
1975Woodwind quintetQuintette Syrinx (R.F.A.)2nd Prize
1975Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent des Jeunesses Musicales de Budapest (Hongrie)3rd Prize
1978HornJohn MacDonald (Canada)2nd Prize
1978HornZdenek Divoky (Tchécoslovaquie)3rd Prize
1978HornJames Ross (USA)3rd Prize
1980TrumpetRichard Steuart (Canada)2nd Prize
1980TrumpetKetil Christensen (Danemark)3rd Prize
1980Woodwind quintetQuintette Chalumeau (R.F.A.)2nd Prize
1980Woodwind quintetQuintette Nielsen (France)2nd Prize
1981TromboneMichel Becquet (France)2nd Prize
1981TromboneMichael Mulcahy (Australie)2nd Prize
1981TromboneGilles Millière (France)3rd Prize
1983HornRadovan Vlatković (Yougoslavie)1st Prize
1983HornMarie Luise Neunecker (R.F.A.)3rd Prize
1983HornCorbin Wagner (USA)3rd Prize
1985Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent de Berlin (R.D.A.)2nd Prize
1985Woodwind quintetQuintette à vent Albert Schweitzer (R.F.A.)3rd Prize
1985Woodwind quintetBritish Wind Quintet (GB)3rd Prize

International music competition in Toulon (France)

YearInstrumentLaureate (Country)Prize
1976TrumpetStanko Arnold (YU)1st Prize
1976TrumpetAntoine Curé (F)2nd Prize
1976TrumpetJ.L. Ramecourt (F)3rd Prize
1977TromboneMichel Becquet (F)1st Prize
1977TromboneGilles Millière (F)1st Prize
1977TromboneJan Gorny (PL)3rd Prize
1977TromboneAlain Manfrin (F)3rd Prize
1980HornNicolae Dosa-Jeandon (R)1st Prize
1980HornErich Markwast (R.D.A.)2nd Prize
1980HornChristophe Danel (F)3rd Prize
1981TrumpetHakan Hardenberger (S)1st Prize
1981TrumpetPaul G. Archibald (GB)2nd Prize
1981TrumpetEric Aubier (F)3rd Prize
1983TromboneBruno Pongy (F)1st Prize
1983TromboneChristian Lindberg (S)2nd Prize
1983TromboneYves Favre (F)3rd Prize

Names and country labels are reproduced as printed in the source. The Munich competition began in 1952; the first entry listed is from 1956.

Brass Bulletin 56, IV / 1986 pages 3–6

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1986–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

How is the digitization progressing?

We’re gradually making the Brass Bulletin available online, article by article. You can read newly digitized articles as soon as they’re ready, even before an entire issue is complete.

Visit our Digitization Roadmap to browse recent additions and see estimated availability for upcoming issues. These estimates follow our recent pace and may change.

Search Brass Bulletin.