Explore institutional access →

4 min. read

ARD Music Competition in Munich in 1986

Once again trumpet, after six years

At the 1986 Munich competition, technical brilliance was no longer enough: changing standards of musical expression were reshaping the expectations placed on young trumpeters.
ARD Music Competition in Munich in 1986

Reinhold Friedrich, Urban Agnas, George Vosburgh

Once again a trumpet competition took place within the framework of the 34th International Music Competition of the Broadcasting Corporations of the German Federal Republic 1986, between 3rd and 12th September in Munich.

The ARD Music Competition has a particularly good reputation among the international contests. In my opinion, there are three reasons:

  1. There are four rounds in all, so that candidates who continue have ample opportunity to show all the facets of their personalities. 2) The voting system of the internationally constituted jury is neither partisan nor subject to manipulation. 3) Candidates are judged first of all on musical grounds and only secondarily on technical ones. The criteria of judging: technique, musical presentation, and artistic personality.

This year the jury consisted of Ludwig Güttler (GDR), Stefan Hadrys (Poland), Paul Lachenmeir (GFR), Bo Nilsson (Sweden), Joachim Pliquett (GFR), Edward H. Tarr (USA), and Guy Touvron (France). Gerd Starke (GFR), a non-trumpeter, was president. Timofei Dokshitser (USSR), who had originally been announced, was unable to attend because of illness.

In 1986, 68 candidates (about double the total of 1980!) had registered, and 47 actually showed up for the first round. They came from the following countries: USA (8 candidates), GFR (7), France (6), Japan (5), Canada, Belgium (4 each), Sweden (3), as well as Austria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Great Britain, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Spain, and Taiwan (1 candidate each). The required piece was the Hummel concerto in the original key of E Major (1st and 2nd movements). As a second piece one could choose between R. Henderson's “Variation Movements” or R. Emig's “Theme and Variations”, both for unaccompanied trumpet. The two pieces had to be played without pause, one after the other, in any order. Emig was considerably easier than Henderson and was chosen by only four candidates, none of whom was picked for the second round.

The fact that the Hummel concerto was required to be performed in E instead of the easier (and incorrect) key of E♭ seems to have stimulated the fantasy both of the participants and also of many instrument makers. No less than six different pitches of trumpet turned up: E (26 times, of these 14 from Chicago and 5 from Hamamatsu), D (9), C (9), as well as B natural, B♭, and A (1 time each). The E trumpets were preponderately lengthened F trumpets (19 cases) rather than shortened E♭ trumpets (5). About half the candidates playing on E trumpets had serious intonation problems. For this reason it was not a surprise to see proportionally more candidates surviving the first round who played on a larger instrument: 6 out of 26 players of the E trumpet, but 6 out of 21 players of trumpets in D (2), C (3), and B natural (1). The pitch of B natural seemed to be the best: not only is the fingering in F major, but the player also has at his disposal all the shadings which a larger instrument has to offer. The young man playing the B trumpet (a C trumpet with a shortened B♭ mouthpipe and tuning slide) also turned out to be the second-prize winner ... but we should not anticipate the final results. The A trumpet demonstrated here, a German B♭ trumpet with lengthened slides, had a muffled sound.

Continue reading

Access the full Digital Edition.

Brass Bulletin 56, IV / 1986 pages 7–11

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1986–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

How is the digitization progressing?

We’re gradually making the Brass Bulletin available online, article by article. You can read newly digitized articles as soon as they’re ready, even before an entire issue is complete.

Visit our Digitization Roadmap to browse recent additions and see estimated availability for upcoming issues. These estimates follow our recent pace and may change.

Search Brass Bulletin.