Explore institutional access Explore institutional access

7 min. read

John Fletcher

Is Big Always Beautiful?

As brass instruments grew larger and louder, John Fletcher saw something being lost: the individual voice, clarity and character that make a player heard.
John Fletcher

John Fletcher

John Fletcher began playing the tuba when he was thirteen. After completing a degree in Natural Science and a Diploma in Education at Pembroke College, Cambridge, he played with the BBC Symphony Orchestra for four years before moving to the London Symphony Orchestra, where he has been ever since. He is familiar throughout the brass world as a member of the Philip Jones Brass Ensemble and has recorded the Vaughan Williams “Tuba Concerto” with the LSO and André Prévin. Additionally, many who would not recognise his name know his sound from the exciting tuba passages in “Star Wars”. A recent performance of the Edward Gregson “Tuba Concerto” with the Locke Brass Ensemble showed that in his combination of delicacy and power, technique and musicality, he remains unsurpassed. Despite this, or perhaps because of it, he is not entirely happy with what is happening, in Britain, to brass sound in general and tuba sound in particular. He told Tom Aitken why.


Since the Second World War it has been the fashion for all brass instruments to become very big. Until then, English brass sound had been well defined: of rather narrow bore nature but very vibrant and full of character, and, very broadly speaking, derived from France rather than Germany.

First of the bigger instruments to arrive were German horns, with their greater safety and fatness of sound, followed almost immediately by American trombones and, later, American trumpets, all considerably wider in bore, with greater possibilities for dynamic range and without the kind of blaring effect you get if you overblow small bore instruments.

The ecology of the orchestra changed. Stringed instruments haven’t really developed much, apart from slightly different placing of bridges and the use of metal strings: they’ve increased their volume only modestly. The woodwind have developed a little more, using softer reeds to produce a fatter, plummier sound. But the brass, in terms of volume and what I call shout level, have increased vastly more than that.

The biggest culprits of all, I would say, have been the timpani. They are the leader of the musical arms race, in which everybody uses bigger and bigger gear, to keep up, they say, with what else is happening.

That certainly was always my excuse. When I first came into the business I couldn’t make a big enough sound. I was deafened by everyone around me and I assumed it must be my fault. To catch up I first moved from F tuba to the E♭. Then I used larger mouthpieces. Then I went onto the C tuba, which — not so much because of wider bore but because of the slightly longer tube — gives you still more depth and grunt.

That’s how it’s happened in my corner, and I’ve been guilty along with other people. But, at the same time, I was very concerned about what we were losing in the process. The central ability to speak through the instrument, which is what all the greatest brass players have done in the past — and was what made them the special ones we actually wanted to listen to — has partly gone.

One reason for what happened in this country was the dry, bloodless acoustics of London’s Royal Festival Hall. In the best continental and American halls there’s a stunning difference. You don’t have to shout. You can play at far more realistic dynamic levels and actually do things with the sound, with note shapes, with the way you project. In the Festival Hall you are shouting, and when you shout — the analogy with the human voice is perfect — it sounds ugly, any kind of voice quality goes completely, and what you’re trying to say sounds objectionable even if it’s ‘I love you’.

In symphonic brass playing, encouraged by conductors who want it ever louder, I and my colleagues (whom I love and admire and respect) make a noise which we do not like because it has become the accepted thing.

I’m not talking about lack of dynamic range. (People are very good at pianissimo.) I’m concerned about actual character of sound.

Continue reading

Access the full Digital Edition.

Brass Bulletin 47, III / 1984 pages 19–24

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1984–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

Search Brass Bulletin.