Explore institutional access Explore institutional access

2 min. read

The hunting horn

The hunting horn

As I have just published a book on the French hunting horn*, I would like to add something of my own discoveries and personal ideas to the article by Daniel Bourgue.

First of all it should be pointed out that most of what we know about the French hunting horn, the trompe de chasse, is due to Major de Marolles (1865-1949). A professional soldier, but also a keen huntsman, Gaston de Marolles devoted a large part of his life to gathering information on the trompe. Unfortunately he was neither historian nor musician; while we must do homage to him for the wealth of material he gathered, we must still be very critical about his interpretations of the facts.

He states, for example, that the ton de vénerie was invented by the Marquis de Dampierre, a Master of the Revels at the court of Louis XV, in 1723. His evidence for this is the memoirs of the Duke of Luynes who reported that “When Dampierre played, the whole Court was amazed”. Since at that time the origin of the ton de vénerie had not been explained, Marolles concluded that Dampierre must have invented it and that this hypothesis fitted in perfectly with the Duke of Luynes's remark. I believe that the historical facts are quite different, as I have set out in my book. Dampierre cannot have invented the ton de vénerie, for various reasons:

— The ton de vénerie is based essentially on dynamics of articulation and phrasing peculiar to the trompe. Daniel Bourgue draws a quite justifiable comparison with jazz (I did the same, without our having consulted one another). It is difficult to see how Dampierre could have invented and perfected — out of nothing, and at the height of the Baroque period — a completely new style demanding a quite particular playing style.

— Dampierre's fanfares contain trills marked “+” on some notes, particularly on final notes. Thus in these cases it is impossible to play the tayau which is the characteristic articulation of the ton de vénerie.

— The first mention of the tayau is in a horn tutor of 1804 — much later than Dampierre, therefore — and its use did not become widespread until around 1830-1840.

— If “the whole Court was amazed”, it is because at that time only servants were musicians and Dampierre, being of noble birth, caused a scandal by sounding the horn. Moreover, there is a linguistic problem: in the classical French of the period the word used (i.e. étonné, in modern French “surprised”) had a much stronger meaning than today and meant (literally) “thunderstruck”. If Dampierre had created the ton de vénerie, he would at the most have caused some surprise but only a social scandal could have left the court thunderstruck.

Thus modern players, contrary to what they believe, are not perpetuating a very old musical tradition, and have forgotten the style in which Dampierre and the whole of the 18th century played. This is the style which I am trying to revive under the name of ton classique (“classical style”), as opposed to the 19th century ton de vénerie (“hunting style”).

In the 18th century the trompe was still nothing more than a large trumpet (whence its name - French trompette) with a very large diameter coil so as to be worn over the shoulder. It was pitched in D because the court trumpets were also in D, and the playing style of this horn was also quite similar to that of the Baroque trumpet. This means that there is a whole repertoire ripe for rediscovery, left on one side by players because it does not suit the ton de vénerie; here is such an example from Dampierre's 24 Fanfares Nouvelles for 2 Cors de Chasse or 2 trumpets, which I have published in my book but which have been long neglected (III. 1).

Extrait des 24 Fanfares Nouvelles pour 2 cors de chasse ou 2 trompettes, de Dampierre

Extrait des 24 Fanfares Nouvelles pour 2 cors de chasse ou 2 trompettes, de Dampierre

This makes it possible to vary the repertoire, because hunting fanfares and the “hunting style”, though very impressive in the forest, soon become monotonous in the concert hall.

Such is the early history of the horn and it is something which ought to interest most horn players. I also think there is much more to be discovered on the subject.

To add to the example given by Daniel Bourgue and to show the neglected resources of the trompe (which is after all nothing but a natural horn), I cannot resist the pleasure of reproducing here the charming Invocation Tyndare.

This short piece, written for 2 hunting horns in D and organ, requires the use of stopped notes. The very clear sound of this horn goes superbly with the organ but the valve horn, despite its more veiled sound, can also give a good account of this music with its fresh simplicity (III. 2).

Illustration 2

Illustration 2

ⁱ L’Art de la Trompe, Tassin-la-Demi Lune 1982.

² Riemann, Musiklexikon, «Tonsystem»: die «Finales» sind das d, e, f und g der kleinen Oktave (Anm. d. Übers.).

Brass Bulletin 39, III / 1982 pages 45–47

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1982–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

Search Brass Bulletin.