Discoveries for brass players, once a month. Join our free newsletter →

5 min. read

This article is free.

Trumpets of the future

Ole Edvard Antonsen and Gérard Métrailler

Trumpets of the future

Ole Edvard Antonsen and Gérard Métrailler

Winners of the 1987 Geneva International Musical Performance Competition

Who are these young stalwarts who appear at these ruthless music competitions? How have they forged their desire to win? BRASS BULLETIN spoke to the recent Geneva winners.

BRASS BULLETIN: How far in advance did you decide to take part in the Geneva competition?

Ole Antonsen: About 8 months before. The Toulon competition in May was a trial run for me but I didn’t have enough time to prepare for it because of the very many (too many) concerts I had just before it.

Gérard Métrailler: As soon as I knew the Geneva competition for trumpet would be in 1987. I would have liked to compete in Prague and Toulon beforehand but my appointment to the OSR and the fact that it was during my trial period there didn’t give me time to prepare.

B.B.: Did you know who you would be competing against?

O.A.: Yes — I had realised in Toulon! That’s why I devoted so much time to Geneva.

G.M.: I knew a few names, but not Ole Antonsen’s, for example.

B.B.: Did you change anything in your normal preparation?

O.A.: Only to intensify my practice timetable. I also took 4 or 5 hours of extra lessons with Harry Kvebaek the week before the competition, and a fortnight before I took part in various regional contests in Norway for practice.

G.M.: I changed as little as possible in my routine but I practised a lot in the month before the competition.

B.B.: How do you rate the difficulty of the 1987 programme?

O.A.: I didn’t really think about it beforehand but during the competition — especially the second round! — I noticed how difficult it was.

G.M.: Difficult, especially the set piece, but playable.

B.B.: Did you listen to the other competitors in the first round? And how did you feel after that first encounter?

O.A.: I listened to about 10 competitors, which enabled me to test the acoustics of the hall at the same time. I was quite satisfied with my performance but I was philosophical as I waited for the results.

G.M.: I listened to a certain number too. I was obviously anxious, the more so as I wasn’t particularly satisfied with the way I had played but, after hearing the second series of competitors the next day, I told myself that maybe I still had a good chance.

B.B.: What happened inside you when you heard that you had been selected for the second round?

O.A.: I was pleased, but overcome with nerves!

G.M.: That was the moment when I hoped to reach the final. The tension increased but so did the motivation and stimulation.

B.B.: How was your experience of the second round?

O.A.: I was no longer thinking of anything but doing as well as possible. I tried to persuade myself that I was about to play in a concert rather than a competition. The acoustics worried me a little. I wondered whether I had overestimated my strength (the Honegger is a real killer). But once I was on the platform, I felt on form. After I played, I didn’t listen to anyone (apart from my friend Agnas) and I took nothing more to do with the other competitors.

G.M.: For me the tension was less than in the first round and I felt distinctly more comfortable playing Enesco and Henze. But obviously I was overcome by uncertainty again and I waited anxiously for the results. I listened to three other semifinalists, but without worrying too much about them.

B.B.: In your opinion, was the orchestral excepts test with the orchestra wise?

O.A.: [smiles]. I found myself in a familiar situation such as I experience every day in Oslo. I was happy to be in the final.

G.M.: It was a difficult round, a new facet to master.

B.B.: After that first half of the final did you have any inkling of the final placing?

O.A.: I was trying not to think about it. I didn’t want to know.

G.M.: I realised that Ole was very sure and that Forman was a little less so. I felt the same thing during the two days we spent together.

B.B.: And at the final confrontation, with the Arutiunian concerto?

O.A.: I had a problem with my 1st valve and that preoccupied me throughout the second part of the performance. My concentration was shaken. What a relief at the end! That was when I realised what nervous tension I’d been under in the last few days.

G.M.: For me it was a double test since the orchestra accompanying me was the one that had taken me on a year before. It was a very special situation. I was torn between fear and pleasure. To begin with I was a bit surprised by the acoustics but I was able to handle it. Overall I was happy with my interpretation.

B.B.: How do you rate this 1987 competition as regards organisation and atmosphere?

O.A.: Very good, apart from a few details: the rehearsals with the orchestra for the final could have been fixed in advance; that stage was a bit agitated. The time between the rounds was very long... A question of planning.

G.M.: Obviously for me it was perfect — I live in Geneva, I was at home, with the all the advantages that brings.

B.B.: How do you rate the jury?

O.A.: ... [laughs]. Perfect! Yes, perfect! [laughs].

G.M.: I only regret that the competitors didn’t have enough contact with these gentlemen, after the various rounds, for example, and especially after the final, so as to be able to benefit from their personal comments.

Ole Edvard Antonsen

1st prize

was born on 25th April 1962 in Hamar, a small Norwegian town of 17 000 inhabitants 75 miles north of Oslo. His father plays clarinet and saxophone, teaches music and conducts a big band and many wind bands. At the age of 5 Ole came across an old trumpet among his father’s things and started to amuse himself with it. A month later his father gave him a new cornet as a present and gave him lessons on it until he was 10. Then he sent him along with his brother, a year younger and also a trumpeter, to Oslo to great Norwegian trumpeter Harry Kvebaek, who was to follow both their careers (Ole still works with him today). From the age of 10 Ole played in his father’s different groups as well as in the Norwegian Youth Orchestra. He often appeared as a soloist with his brother, who later became more involved with light music and jazz. At the age of 16, still studying with Kvebaek, Ole entered the Oslo Academy of Music, where, three years later, he obtained the highest distinction. He lives in Oslo and works hard in every sector (studios, theatres, big bands etc.). Although often approached about orchestral solo trumpet posts, he prefers his job as 2nd trumpet in the Oslo Philharmonic, which he has held since 1982 and which gives him enough freedom to play wherever he wants and prepare for his solo career.

Gérard Métrailler

2nd prize

was born on 5th october 1961 in Chalais (Switzerland). He took up the cornet at the age of 13 at the village band music school. At the age of 16 he started a precision engineering apprenticeship, while playing with the Brass Band 13 Etoiles. He continued, self-taught, until he was 20 and then enrolled at the Geneva Conservatoire, first with Mario Alberti, who had him change to trumpet, and since 1983 with Michel Cuvit, Paolo Longinotti’s successor as solo trumpet at the Suisse Romande and professor at the Geneva Conservatoire. He obtained his diploma in 1985 and a year later was appointed 1st trumpet doubling solo at the Suisse Romande. Today he is preparing for his virtuoso diploma.

Brass Bulletin 61, I / 1988 pages 38–43

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1988–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

How is the digitization progressing?

We’re gradually making the Brass Bulletin available online, article by article. You can read newly digitized articles as soon as they’re ready, even before an entire issue is complete.

Visit our Digitization Roadmap to browse recent additions and see estimated availability for upcoming issues. These estimates follow our recent pace and may change.

Search Brass Bulletin.