Explore institutional access →

5 min. read

Markneukirchen 1986

International Brass Competitions

The brass were in the limelight this year in Markneukirchen, with simultaneous trumpet, horn and trombone competitions.

The Klingenthal-Markneukirchen area of southern East Germany, a centre of European instrument making for three and a half centuries, does more than just maintain its prestigious historical tradition; for several years those promoting musical industry and craftsmanship have provided an important starting point for young soloists in the form of international instrumental competitions. The reputation of these competitions continues to grow, as is evident from the ever-increasing number of applications and the excellent standards of the participants.

The twelve-day Vogtland Music Festival 1986 played host to the cream of the younger generation of brass players (except for the tuba, which had a competition last year) from 21 countries: Australia (1), Belgium (1), Brazil (1), Bulgaria (4), Cuba (3), Czechoslovakia (19), Finland (2), France (5), FRG (9), GDR (12), Hungary (10), Italy (2), Japan (2), Netherlands (1), Norway (3), Poland (7), Romania (1), Sweden (3), Switzerland (1), United States (1) and Yugoslavia (1).

A brief review

It was a pleasure to note the excellent standard among the participants. Some candidates showed a clear move towards solo attitudes and ambitions based on less “symphonic” notions of performance than in the past (although the majority — in line with their training — stay with the “orchestral” idea of the instrument’s role).

You will find it interesting to read the opposite account by Roland Schnorhk (jury member) of the trombone competition; most of what he says applies equally to the trumpet and horn competitions.

After these 1986 competitions the excellent organisers may rest assured that they had indeed attracted the most interesting current candidates and that, at this level, they no longer have any reason to envy the longer established international competitions.

Markneukirchen is now part of the international circuit which enables young players to evaluate themselves, listen to themselves and gauge where they stand. More important still — its ideal geographical situation (between east and west), the exceptional concentration of instrument and mouthpiece makers and the friendliness of a small provincial town are ideal for meetings and contacts. This is a most unusual link, which we should all try to develop.

There is no doubt that, faced with this encouraging success, the organisers will strive to improve still further the quality of the accommodation and access to the GDR.

Music — we must be conscious of this privilege! — knows no frontiers.

The results

Trumpet (29 candidates):
1st prize: not awarded
2nd: Gabriele Cassone (Italy) and Gerd Fischer (GDR)
3rd: not awarded
Progress prize: Werner Heckmann (FRG)

Trombone (28 candidates):
1st: not awarded
2nd: Michael Mulcahy (Australia)
3rd: Andrea Bandini (Italy) and Michael Jasko (Czechoslovakia)
Progress prize: Dirk Lehmann (GDR)

Horn (33 candidates):
1st: Miclós Nagy (Hungary)
2nd: Jens Köhli (GDR) and Andreas Langosch (GDR)
3rd: not awarded
Progress prize: Nicolae Apostol (Romania)

The winners

Gabriele Cassone was born in Udine on 6th September 1959. Diplomas in trumpet (1976) and composition (1984). Since 1976 he has been 1st trumpet at the Pomeriggi Musicali Orchestra in Milan and also teaches trumpet there. In 1985 he won 1st prize for trumpet at the Cagliari competition.

His most elegant, refined and original style and his exceptional technique make him one of the most interesting representatives of the younger generation of soloists.

Gerd Fischer was born in Bad Elster on 25th October 1961. Studied in turn with Albrecht Herrmann (Markneukirchen), at the Halle special music school (from 1975) and with Kurt Ramm at the F. Mendelssohn-Bartholdy College of Music in Leipzig. Since 1985 he has been solo trumpet, and responsible for high trumpet parts, at the famous Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra.

Has exceptional physical strength and endurance — a genuine large symphony orchestra soloist, capable of playing over, and leading, a hundred other musicians. An exceptional musician.

Michael Mulcahy was born in Sydney on 23rd January 1958. He studied at the New South Wales Conservatory there with Geoffrey Bailey. He is currently solo trombone at the West German Radio Orchestra in Cologne. In 1981 he won both 2nd prize at the Munich International Trombone Competition and 1st prize at the Vercelli Competition.

Has the confidence of a great soloist! Sound, sense of phrasing and musicality are the great strengths of this most appealing artist, of whom we will certainly hear much more in the next few years.

Miklós Nagy was born in Budapest on 17th May 1963. He has been studying with Adam Friedrich at the Franz Liszt Academy of Music there for five years. Already holds his teaching diploma (1984) and won 3rd prize at the Geneva competition in 1985.

Another perfect product of the famous Hungarian school! Accomplished virtuosity in the service of music.

Markneukirchen trombone competition

ROLAND SCHNORHK *

An international competition is an important event for any competitor, the culmination of long hours of practice, for most the opportunity to compare themselves with others and, above all, to take stock of themselves, of their level of technical and psychological preparation and perhaps also of their musical and instrumental beliefs.

The Markneukirchen competition assumed even greater importance in trombonists’ eyes for having been the object of a three-year wait — the last international competition was in Toulon in 1983. It is also the start of a new run: Prague (87) Geneva and Munich (88).

The competition, a privileged encounter, offers all these young musicians of different schools, cultures, sensitivities and languages a certain enrichment thanks to the contacts and bonds of friendship which arise there. In the town of Markneukirchen, small but rich in a living musical tradition, the special local conditions greatly favour and promote these contacts. And the welcome given to all the competitors, both by the organising committee and the local authorities and by the population in general, was one of warmth, friendship and receptiveness.

The trombone competition

Out of 47 competitors who had registered 28 appeared, representing thirteen countries: sixteen from Eastern Europe, eight from the West and one each from Australia, Brazil, Cuba and Japan. Fourteen remained for round two (eight countries) and five for the final.

One of the peculiarities of the Markneukirchen competition, one that could have been specified in the regulations, is that the points obtained in each round are added together. Thus the placings after round two and after the final are made by adding together both or all three rounds respectively. This demands complete preparation and total involvement in each round. Those who have made it a habit, or a goal, to hold themselves back, to make only so much effort, have little chance of reaching the final. Note, however, that appearing “in the final with orchestra”, before an inevitably larger audience, must count more than in the first round.

Another rule, stated quite clearly this time, is that the concerto with orchestra must be played by heart. This is all the more acceptable in that we were dealing with the Albrechtsberger concerto. The same thing could easily be done at any competition, whether with this concerto or the Wagenseil, our two classical concertos. But it was not so easy for everyone — far from it: one of the five finalists had to withdraw. But rules are made to be applied, even if they are questionable, and questioned. So let each competition keep its peculiarities and remember that, if there were a perfect set of rules, it would have been applied everywhere long ago.

As for the programme, each round had a set piece (David, Schenker, Albrechtsberger) and an optional piece:

Round 1 - Martin (chosen ten times); Serocki: “Sonatina” (9x); Hindemith (7x); Matej: “Sonata” (once); Saint-Saëns (once).

Round 2 - Pauer: “Trombonetta” (3x); Dutilleux (3x); Milhaud (8x)

Round 3 - Serocki: “Concerto” (3x); Tomasi (twice); Spisak.

Despite the overall high standard at this competition no 1st prize was awarded. A 2nd prize was awarded unanimously to Michael Mulcahy (Australia) and two 3rd prizes to Michal Jasko (Czechoslovakia) and Andrea Bandini (Italy).

As always, for everyone who came away happy, many came away disappointed. Both groups should profit from this experience, happy or otherwise, and cherish the memory of the friendly visit to Markneukirchen.

Brass Bulletin 55, III / 1986 pages 25–27

All content is protected by copyright © Brass Bulletin 1986–2026

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn
Loading…

Questions & Answers

How the Digital Edition works

What does the Digital Edition include?

The Digital Edition brings together the articles already digitized as searchable online texts—not simply as scans or PDF files—along with their original illustrations, notes, authorship, issue information, and available translations. Related-article suggestions currently include only this digitized material.

Are the digital articles identical to the originals?

We preserve the original text, language, illustrations, captions, footnotes, and editorial context as faithfully as possible. The presentation is adapted for comfortable online reading, and obvious transcription or scanning errors may be corrected. The substance and character of the published article remain unchanged.

Which languages are available?

Brass Bulletin was published in English, French, and German throughout its history. Italian and Spanish translations were added from issue No. 60 onward.

On the Italian and Spanish sites, articles from issues 1–59 are therefore shown in English by default.

How often are new articles added?

New articles are added almost daily, with approximately one complete issue digitized each week. The pace may vary depending on the preparation, image work, and editorial checking required.

Why aren’t all articles available digitally?

The complete Brass Bulletin collection contains 1,246 articles published between 1971 and 2003. The full index is already available online, allowing readers to discover every article in the collection, including those whose complete text has not yet been digitized.

Digitization began in February 2026. Each article is carefully prepared for online reading, checked, and connected to its issue, authors, subjects, and illustrations. At the current pace of digitization, the complete collection is expected to be available online by February 2028.

Why do some references mention articles that are not available yet?

References in the original articles are preserved even when the material they point to has not yet been digitized. This keeps the historical and editorial record intact. As more issues are added to the Digital Edition, an increasing number of these references will lead to articles that can be read online.

Can I suggest an article or report a transcription error?

Yes. If there is an article you would particularly like to see digitized, or if you notice a possible transcription error or missing detail, please contact us. Reader feedback helps us improve the Digital Edition and prioritize useful connections within the archive.

How can I support Brass Bulletin?

Your support helps fund the preparation, verification, and online publication of the complete collection.

Subscribe to the Digital Edition

Prefer to support us without subscribing?

Make a donation

How is the digitization progressing?

We’re gradually making the Brass Bulletin available online, article by article. You can read newly digitized articles as soon as they’re ready, even before an entire issue is complete.

Visit our Digitization Roadmap to browse recent additions and see estimated availability for upcoming issues. These estimates follow our recent pace and may change.

Search Brass Bulletin.