Not the same
When our American friends honoured us with their presence in Montreux, they were able to benefit from an American organisation on the spot, having travelled on advantageous charter flights. The official language — even in Montreux — was English.
The guilds are useful
Noting a number of problems in establishing internationalism does not mean that one is against this kind of association. It seems obvious that such organisations can help facilitate and develop an exchange of ideas and stimulate a widening of knowledge (although one has to beware of the singular lack of healthy argument which friendly instrumental associations engender — “Everybody’s great, everybody’s nice”).
It must also be recognised that the American guilds have not succeeded in taking a hold of brass players as they had hoped. Their “international” penetration has always been very modest and unrepresentative, despite all their efforts. This is one message which is very clear and which our transatlantic friends should read.
Refusal of hegemony
The world is rich and varied and must remain so. That there should be global influences is a good thing, but we must resist hegemony.
Welcome initiatives
In the last few years we have noted the founding of national associations in many countries. These associations bear clear and legitimate names (French National Horn Association, French Trombone Guild, Japanese Trumpet Guild). BRASS BULLETIN views this movement sympathetically and supports it. It is a good thing that every country, indeed every region, should research and cultivate its identity and pass it on to its artists. On that basis nothing should stand in the way of international exchanges; quite the opposite, indeed. However — the IBC2 organisers have set up a marathon of fabulous events which makes it all the more unfortunate not to be able to attend (see below).